anomaly case

Let us assume that the observed value of a piece of the EEG signal at the th point has been denoted as , . The difference between them is the sensitivity to noise, as discussed in [49]. The basic premise of anomaly EEG detection. Impacts of different metrics on anomaly detection results are evaluated based on two data sets. Business use case: Spending $100 on food every day during the holiday season is normal, but may be odd otherwise. This section introduces a variety of metrics from other areas that would be potentially available for our problem and modify/extend them if necessary to incorporate with the considered anomaly EEG detection problem. However, since the focus of this paper is on the investigation of similarity metric, we do not make additional discussion on this issue. To cope with this problem, the similarity needs to be normalized for some of them, and the normalization will be given in Section 4.2. Principal Product Manager, and They are not necessarily the most efficient solution. Recall that the main frequency components of EEG are -wave (4 Hz), -wave (4–8 Hz), -wave (8–14 Hz), -wave (14–30 Hz), and -wave (30 Hz) [43]. The detail results of six metrics using the training data of the Bern-Barcelona EEG database. Clustering is one of the most popular concepts in the domain of unsupervised learning. The so-called power spectrum is extracted as features of EEG signals, and a null hypothesis testing is employed to make the final decision. Anomaly detection systems use those expectations to identify actionable signals within your data, uncovering outliers in key KPIs to alert you to key events in your organization. Moreover, the test data are further equally divided into two groups: one for optimizing threshold and one for final testing. As such, two curves corresponding to normal testing data and abnormal testing data can be obtained, and they intersect at point O. Five compared feature extraction methods and the corresponding operations. That is, if a neurological disorder happens, the amplitudes of these frequencies change accordingly. 搜索 It is able to detect data points that are 2 sigma away from the fitted curve. ABE, N., Zadrozny, B., and Langford, J. Business use case: Someone is trying to copy data form a remote machine to a local host unexpectedly, an anomaly that would be flagged as a potential cyber attack. It is noticed that the metrics of HD achieve the best performance in terms of AOPO, i.e., 3.65; in terms of accuracy, the HD outperforms others. In order to solve the problem, symmetric Kullback–Leibler divergence is very popular in various statistical distance metrics [35] and is calculated by, HD was first proposed by Hellinger in [36]. A case study of anomaly detection in Python. Therefore, for the Bern-Barcelona EEG database, the metrics of BD achieves the best performance in terms of AOPO, i.e., 1.55; in terms of accuracy, the BD outperforms others. Here, one can note that, the distance metric for similarity quantification is not necessary to meet all of these properties especially the triangle inequality, under which such kinds of distance are called as non-metric distances [29]. The hypothesis testing described in Section 4.2.3 is used to classify the group 1 of testing data using all investigated metrics with different threshold λ values. Motivation . A variety of typical metrics, that are potentially available for EEG analysing, are introduced to measure the similarity between and . The definition of abnormal or normal may frequently change, as malicious adversaries constantly adapt themselves. Now, you have some introductory knowledge of anomaly detection, including how to use low-pass filter and simple moving average to detect abnormalities. Detection result by using (a) ED, (b) PCCD, (c) SKLD, (d) HD, (e) KD, and (f) BD. The compared results of the six metrics in two ways using the testing data of the Bern-Barcelona EEG database for one experiment. Anomaly EEG detection is a long-standing problem in analysis of EEG signals. Two examples are given in Figures 6 and 7, in which we show the similarity scores of all investigated metrics (using their optimal λ) for a normal testing recording and an abnormal testing recording. Section 5 shows the results with some discussion. The process of data collection is depicted in Figure 2. Use Case: Anomaly Detection Overview Anomaly detection (also outlier detection) is the identification of items, events or observations which do not conform to an expected pattern or other items in a data set. credit card transactions to fault detection in operating environments. Therefore, the threshold based on moving average may not always apply. The similarities S between the testing data and the template set are labelled by red circles. The above experimental procedure was also implemented 20 times. These findings reflect the priority of the Bhattacharyya coefficient when dealing with the highly noisy EEG signals. 法语 / Français Below is a brief overview of popular machine learning-based techniques for anomaly detection. Anomaly detection is similar to — but not entirely the same as — noise removal and novelty detection. We will be providing unlimited waivers of publication charges for accepted research articles as well as case reports and case series related to COVID-19. In the following, we identify some typical metrics with potentials to solving our problem by careful reviewing of the relevant literature. 在 IBM Knowledge Center 中搜索, IBM Knowledge Center 使用 JavaScript。 似乎已禁用脚本编制或您的浏览器不支持脚本编制。 请允许使用 JavaScript，然后重试。. The original multichannel EEG signals are obtained using the data collector. In order to take advantages of the Bhattacharyya coefficient, we will exploit an integrated metric combining HD and BD for similarity measure of EEG signals in the future work. The PCCD between and can be calculated by, So, the similarity defined by PCCD is then calculated by, SKLD can be used to measure the difference between two probability distributions, widely used in information retrieval and data science [33, 34]. deeper into techniques that address more specific use cases in the most efficient way possible. Examples of testing data: (a) collected data with our setup, and (b) data taken from Bern-Barcelona EEG database. From the results shown in Table 7, we can see that, for our database, in terms of AOPO, the metrics of HD and BD perform better than others when using different features. It can be found that all the metrics output the right result for the normal testing data. Based on the above calculation of power spectrum, the testing data and the compared template can be represented as their corresponding power spectrums and , respectively. It can be clearly seen that, in this experiment, HD, KD, and BD have achieved the best results in terms of AOPO; in terms of accuracy, BD works best. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 希伯来语 / עברית ACM Press, New York, 504–509, V Chandola, A Banerjee and V Kumar 2009. And the similarities are also arranged in ascending order (normal testing data) or descending order (abnormal testing data). Additionally, for each data set, we first select 30 pieces of most table normal data segments to form a template set, and the stability and normality here are judged according to domain experts, and the residuals are as the test data. An example of similarity scores for a normal testing data of the Bern-Barcelona EEG database. Generally, to design an appropriate similarity metric, that is compatible with the considered problem/data, is also an important issue in the design of such detection systems. The original data are recorded with a sampling rate of 1,024 Hz. 2020, Article ID 6925107, 16 pages, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6925107, 1Key Laboratory of High-Efficiency and Clean Mechanical Manufacture of MOE, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Mechanical Engineering Education, School of Mechanical Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan 250061, China, 2Institute of Neurology, Shandong University, Jinan, China, 3Department of Neurology, Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China. The above experimental process was implemented 20 times. (ii)The second data set is taken from the public Bern-Barcelona EEG data set. Based on the results shown in Section 5, the following are found:(1)Experimental results demonstrate the positive impacts of different similarity metrics on anomaly EEG detection. resources... By Elena Sunshine, Sr. 西班牙语 / Español We summarize the results of investigated metrics by combining their results in two terms of AOPO and accuracy in Table 2. The mean results using our database for all experiments. Depending on the distribution of a use case in a time-series setting, and the dynamicity of the environment, you may need to use stationary (global) or non-stationary (local) standard deviation to stabilize a model. In contrast, the difference between normal and abnormal EEG signals in the frequency domain is more clear, thus allowing for quantitative inspection, i.e., similarity measure, for EEG data inspection. In recent years, we have witnessed significant improvements of using electroencephalogram (EEG) measurement for data acquisition in a wide range of clinical applications. Recall that both BD and HD are obtained by certain transformations of the Bhattacharyya coefficient , i.e.. Its detailed process can refer to [, Artifact subspace reconstruction (ASR) is relatively new technique, and it is based on new approach of signal reconstruction with the reference signal fragment. We then review the method of anomaly EEG detection in the following [25]. 挪威语 / Norsk The main objective of this work is to investigate the impacts of different similarity metrics on anomaly EEG detection. (2)Among all investigated metrics, the HD and BD metrics, that are constructed based on the Bhattacharyya coefficient, show excellent performances. They could be broadly classified into two algorithms: K-nearest neighbor: k-NN is a simple, non-parametric lazy learning technique used to classify data based on similarities in distance metrics such as Eucledian, Manhattan, Minkowski, or Hamming distance. Table 8 shows the results in term of accuracy. The AOPO results of the seven feature extraction methods using the Bern-Barcelona EEG database. From these results, it can be clearly seen that HD, KD, and BD achieve the best result, the ED and PCCD have achieved not-so-good results, while the SKLD has the worst results. 英语 / English Feature Highlight: Using Resource Principals in the Data Science service, Announcement: Resource Principals and other Improvements to Oracle Cloud Infrastructure Data Science Now Available, Data Science Trials: Everything You Need to Know. Along this line of research, many efforts have been made to enhance the feature extraction as seen in [16–18], and some of them also involve the decision-making [4, 19, 20]. Depending on your business model and use case, time series data anomaly detection can be used for valuable metrics such as: Web page views; Daily active users The low pass filter allows you to identify anomalies in simple use cases, but there are certain situations where this technique won't work. This study therefore provides a preliminary basis for the EEG signal processing. Especially, the commonly used ED did not achieve satisfactory results when compared with other metrics. A support vector machine is another effective technique for detecting anomalies. In an upcoming tutorial, we will dive. 土耳其语 / Türkçe 哈萨克语 / Қазақша Two examples are given in Figures 9 and 10, in which we show the similarity scores of all investigated metrics (using their λ0) for a normal testing recording and an abnormal testing recording. Combining the results from two tested data sets, it is clear that HD and BD achieve a better performance than the other compared metrics. Tables 9 and 10 show the detection results for the Bern-Barcelona EEG database. The HD between and can be calculated by, Thus, the similarity based on HD can be calculated as, KD was introduced by Kolmogorov [37]. In order to analyse all the experimental results, we calculated the average of the AOPO and accuracy values obtained from all experiments based on a global mean measure and show the results in Table 3. That information, along with your comments, will be governed by It is closely related to the Bhattacharyya coefficient, which measures the overlap between two statistical samples or populations [23]. 希腊语 / Ελληνικά In future work, we will exploit an integrated metric that combines HD and BD for the similarity measure of EEG signals. Their operations are provided in Table 6. They achieved excellent performances for two inspected data sets: an AOPO value of 3.5 and an accuracy of 0.9167 for our data set and an AOPO value of 1.5 and an accuracy of 0.9667 for the Bern-Barcelona EEG data set. DISQUS terms of service. Results of six metrics using the training data of our database. As a result, it would be very difficult to judge whether the EEG signal is abnormal through time-domain analysis. ED is the most common metric that refers to the real distance between two points in space [31]. In this section, we will focus on building a simple anomaly-detection package using moving average to identify anomalies in the number of sunspots per month in a sample dataset, which can be downloaded here using the following command: The file has 3,143 rows, which contain information about sunspots collected between the years 1749-1984. Time series is an important class of EEG data. From left to right: the similarity between each piece of data in the training data set and the template set; the accuracy of the metric for the normal training data, abnormal training data, and all training data. Nonetheless, we should be aware that it is also an important aspect to design an appropriate similarity metric, that is compatible with the considered data, when designing such an anomaly detection system [21]. In our case, f(T) represents the sunspot counts at time T.  g(t —T) is the moving average kernel. The anomaly detection is concerned with recognising new inputs that differ in some way from those that are usual under normal states [26]. An example of similarity scores for a normal testing data in our database metrics. The AOPO results of the seven feature extraction methods using our database. After a subband passing filtering (the resulting EEG data are denoted as after filtering), the power spectrum can be estimated using the Welch method, a typical power spectrum estimation method, bywhere and is the window function. In this paper, the size of the templates was set as 20 seconds empirically according to our clinical experience. Anomaly EEG detection is a long-standing problem in analysis of EEG signals. 简体中文 / 简体中文 The values of λ corresponding to the highest accuracy are used to calculate the accuracy of the group 2 data set. The SKLD between and can be calculated bybut it is not a distance metric because of its asymmetry. To employ a specific metric to measure/quantify the similarity between two data recordings, i.e., individual EEG segments(iii)Decision-Making. The main objective of this work is to investigate the impacts of different similarity metrics on anomaly EEG detection. The similarities S between the testing data and the template set are labelled by red circles. Then, these EEG signals were downsampled to 512 Hz prior to further analysis so that each piece of EEG data contains 10,240 samples in length [. The compared results of the six metrics in two ways using the testing data of our database for one experiment. This type of anomaly is common in time-series data. The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper. Copyright © 2020 Guangyuan Chen et al. 葡萄牙语/葡萄牙 / Português/Portugal The nearest set of data points are evaluated using a score, which could be Eucledian distance or a similar measure dependent on the type of the data (categorical or numerical). Thus, we collect a variety of most popular and state-of-the-art metrics from other areas that would be potentially available for our problem and modify/extend them if necessary to incorporate with the anomaly EEG detection. The Gaussian distribution is the most typical assumption, and some other quantifiers, e.g., a direct threshold, can be also applicable to achieve this end. They randomly select 3,750 pairs of simultaneously recorded signals from the pool of all signals measured at focal and nonfocal EEG channels, respectively, and divide the recordings into time windows of 20 seconds. Consistent with the mechanism of anomaly EEG detection introduced previously in this paper, we perform three steps, i.e., feature extraction, similarity measure, and decision-making, to carry out our experiment. The primary reason variable for each anomalous case is displayed, along with its impact, value for that case, and peer group norm. 泰国语 / ภาษาไทย The x axis represents time in days (since 2013) and the y axis represents the value of the stock in dollars. Note: The analyses above are intended is to highlight how you can quickly build a simple anomaly detector. The results demonstrate the positive impacts of different similarity metrics on anomaly EEG detection. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. The resulting comparison results, i.e., the similarity scores, allow for a change detection by testing a null hypothesis, against on the parameters of an assumed distribution. We first carry out a prior estimation to confirm the optimal value of with a number of EEG testing data and then use it to detect all other testing EEG signals in the experiment. This study provides a preliminary basis for analysing the EEG data. Typically, this scheme includes three steps: feature extraction, similarity measure, and decision-making. Section 6 finally concludes this paper and shows the future work. Two indicators have been used to evaluate the detection performance. The data are divided into several samples using a 10,000 points nonoverlapping window. It can be seen that (1) HD and BD are the best metrics in terms of AOPO and (2) HD works best in terms of accuracy. Actually, many successful attempts have been reported using these frequencies to diagnose the neurological disorders [44, 45]. Figure 8 gives the detection results for all investigated metrics using the training data of the public Bern-Barcelona EEG database. This size of the templates is a trade-off between sensitiveness to EEG status change and robustness to noise. This type of anomaly is common in time-series data. These findings reflect the priority of the Bhattacharyya coefficient when dealing with the highly noisy EEG signals. The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing. Novelty detection is concerned with identifying an unobserved pattern in new observations not included in training data — like a sudden interest in a new channel on YouTube during Christmas, for instance. Current approaches mainly focus on EEG feature extraction and decision-making, and few of them involve the similarity measure/quantification. Based on these results, the investigated metrics can be ranked as HD > BD > KD > SKLD > ED = PCCD. The process of data collection is depicted in Figure, The second data set is taken from the public Bern-Barcelona EEG data set. The original data are recorded with a sampling rate of 1,024 Hz. This overview will cover several methods of detecting anomalies, as well as how to build a detector in Python using simple moving average (SMA) or low-pass filter. Examples of data in this data set are shown in Figure 3(b). Relative density of data: This is better known as local outlier factor (LOF). It can be clearly seen that the metrics of HD and BD perform better than other alternatives in both terms of AOPO and accuracy. Noise removal (NR) is the process of immunizing analysis from the occurrence of unwanted observations; in other words, removing noise from an otherwise meaningful signal. The averages of the AOPO and accuracy values obtained from all experiments are shown in Table 5. Experiments were conducted on two data sets to investigate them. However, it is very difficult to determine which of them is more appropriate for analysing the highly noisy EEG signals. A smaller AOPO means a greater difference between the normal recordings and the abnormal recordings, indicating that the similarity indicator is better; otherwise, the similarities between the two classes of recordings are not much low, meaning that the similarity indicator is not good enough. An example of the similarity scores for an abnormal testing data in our database. Data instances that fall outside of these groups could potentially be marked as anomalies. Sunspots are defined as dark spots on the surface of the sun. Examples of tested data samples are shown in Figure 3(a). The abscissa of point O (AOPO) can provide an overall evaluation for normal and abnormal testing data. Experimental results demonstrate the positive impacts of different similarity metrics on anomaly EEG detection. In this section, we first assume that the collected EEG recordings have been already represented by employed features (the feature extraction will be given in the following Section 4.2.1). Outlier detection by active learning. One of its mining tasks is to detect potential anomaly event(s)/pattern(s) at an early stage in a long-term EEG monitoring process, which is highly required by change detection [11–13], seizure prediction [14, 15], etc. DISQUS’ privacy policy. The basic premise of anomaly EEG detection is consideration of the similarity between two nonstationary EEG recordings. 斯洛伐克语 / Slovenčina A larger value of this metric implies a stronger correlation of the two compared series [32]. Mathematically, an n-period simple moving average can also be defined as a "low pass filter." To make a decision by testing a null hypothesis based on the resulting similarity scores. The accuracy results of the seven feature extraction methods using our database. The results of AOPO and accuracy of our database are shown in Tables 7 and 8, respectively. 日语 / 日本語 Please note that DISQUS operates this forum. 斯洛文尼亚语 / Slovenščina To extract explanatory parameters from the raw EEG data in order to reduce data redundancy(ii)Similarity Measure. We denote it as , where the and are the features extracted from and . Density-based anomaly detection is based on the k-nearest neighbors algorithm. It can be found that PCCD and KD output wrong results for the abnormal testing data, while the others output the right results. The study of sunspots helps scientists understand the sun's properties over a period of time; in particular, its magnetic properties. It is used in probability and statistics to measure the similarity between two probability distributions, which belongs to f-divergence [36]. 荷兰语 / Nederlands Both groups contain 30 pieces of data segments, of which 15 pieces are normal data segments, and the other pieces are abnormal. The basic premise of this problem is consideration of the similarity between two nonstationary EEG recordings. Current approaches mainly focus on EEG feature extraction and decision-making, and few of them involve the similarity measure/quantification. Before getting started, it is important to establish some boundaries on the definition of an anomaly. The testing data in this section are from two data sets:(i)The first data set is established based on our system setup. From left to right: the similarity between each piece of data in the training data set and the template set and the accuracy of the metric for the normal training data, abnormal training data, and all training data. Anomaly detection is a technique used to identify unusual patterns that do not conform to expected behavior, called outliers. A SVM is typically associated with supervised learning, but there are extensions (OneClassCVM, for instance) that can be used to identify anomalies as an unsupervised problems (in which training data are not labeled). The is inspected as an anomaly event if the resulting similarity score exceeds a predefined threshold , i.e., ; otherwise, it is inspected as normal. The (anti-)similarity can be then quantified as the maximum similarity between the query recording and the templates using a similarity metric . Among all investigated metrics, the HD and BD metrics, that are constructed based on the Bhattacharyya coefficient, show excellent performances. One is to reflect the level of measured similarity between two compared EEG signals, and the other is to quantify the detection accuracy. An example of similarity scores for an abnormal testing data of the Bern-Barcelona EEG database. Anomaly EEG detection is a long-standing problem in analysis of EEG signals. Almost no formal professional experience is needed to follow along, but the reader should have some basic knowledge of calculus (specifically integrals), the programming language Python, functional programming, and machine learning. A greater value of distance indicates a smaller level of similarity. The similarity metric is essential to report an accurate and reliable detection result, and its construction normally relies on a specific distance metric. A well-established scheme is based on sequence matching. 加泰罗尼亚语 / Català Peer, and M. Buss, “Feature extraction and selection for emotion recognition from EEG,”, T. Zhang, W. Chen, and M. Li, “AR based quadratic feature extraction in the vmd domain for the automated seizure detection of EEG using random forest classifier,”, A. F. Rabbi and R. Fazel-Rezai, “A fuzzy logic system for seizure onset detection in intracranial EEG,”, X.-W. Wang, D. Nie, and B.-L. Lu, “Emotional state classification from EEG data using machine learning approach,”, Q. Liu, X.-g. Zhao, and Z.-g. Hou, “Metric learning for event-related potential component classification in EEG signals,” in, B. K. Patra, R. Launonen, V. Ollikainen, and S. Nandi, “A new similarity measure using Bhattacharyya coefficient for collaborative filtering in sparse data,”, G. Sidorov, A. Gelbukh, H. Gómez-Adorno, and D. Pinto, “Soft similarity and soft cosine measure: similarity of features in vector space model,”, L. Lin, G. Wang, W. Zuo, X. Feng, and L. Zhang, “Cross-domain visual matching via generalized similarity measure and feature learning,”, G. Chen, G. Lu, W. Shang, and Z. Xie, “Automated change-point detection of EEG signals based on structural time-series analysis,”, M. A. F. Pimentel, D. A. Clifton, L. Clifton, and L. Tarassenko, “A review of novelty detection,”, A. Delorme, T. Sejnowski, and S. Makeig, “Enhanced detection of artifacts in EEG data using higher-order statistics and independent component analysis,”, G. Giannakakis, V. Sakkalis, M. Pediaditis, and M. Tsiknakis, “Methods for seizure detection and prediction: an overview,” in, M. Alamuri, B. R. Surampudi, and A. Negi, “A survey of distance/similarity measures for categorical data,” in, P. Papadimitriou, A. Dasdan, and H. Garcia-Molina, “Web graph similarity for anomaly detection,”, I. Dokmanic, R. Parhizkar, J. Ranieri, and M. Vetterli, “Euclidean distance matrices: essential theory, algorithms, and applications,”, J. R. Hershey and P. A. Olsen, “Approximating the Kullback Leibler divergence between Gaussian mixture models,” in, S. Tabibian, A. Akbari, and B. Nasersharif, “Speech enhancement using a wavelet thresholding method based on symmetric Kullback-Leibler divergence,”, E. Hellinger, “Neue begründung der theorie quadratischer formen von unendlichvielen veränderlichen,”, A. Kolmogorov, “On the approximation of distributions of sums of independent summands by infinitely divisible distributions,” in, C. A. Fuchs and J. van de Graaf, “Cryptographic distinguishability measures for quantum-mechanical states,”, H. Laurent and C. Doncarli, “Stationarity index for abrupt changes detection in the time-frequency plane,”, A. Bhattacharyya, “On a measure of divergence between two statistical populations defined by their probability distributions,”, R. G. Andrzejak, K. Schindler, and C. Rummel, “Nonrandomness, nonlinear dependence, and nonstationarity of electroencephalographic recordings from epilepsy patients,”, A. R. Hassan, S. Siuly, and Y. Zhang, “Epileptic seizure detection in EEG signals using tunable-Q factor wavelet transform and bootstrap aggregating,”, P. Kellaway, “An orderly approach to visual analysis: characteristics of the normal EEG of adults and children,”, A. Subasi and M. Ismail Gursoy, “EEG signal classification using PCA, ICA, LDA and support vector machines,”, E. Başar and B. Güntekin, “Review of delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma response oscillations in neuropsychiatric disorders,” in, S. Li, W. Zhou, Q. Yuan, S. Geng, and D. Cai, “Feature extraction and recognition of ictal EEG using EMD and SVM,”, Y. Kumar, M. L. Dewal, and R. S. Anand, “Epileptic seizures detection in EEG using DWT-based ApEn and artificial neural network,”, M. Plechawska-Wojcik, M. Kaczorowska, and D. Zapala, “The artifact subspace reconstruction (ASR) for EEG signal correction.